INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Utility for exams of UPSC

1235»

Comments

  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
  • It’s not about CSAT paper only. What people miss out is that post CSAT qualifying era , there is only one paper; Gs or not it does not matter , but having only 100 questions that too quite skewed one , see there were 70 questions from current affairs in 2016 and fairly traditional paper in 2017 ! Now here is the catch . There should be 2 papers at least . Whether it is CSAT or not is not the criteria . But making prelims a gamble is taking heavy toll on sincere students . More so when post 2014 , most questions have become factual and the era of concepts I.e 2011 to 2014 is gone.
    Now those claiming to be from good colleges have probably forgotten that it is not the CSAT that killed people primarily , it was the conceptual GS paper that was a real risk for most of these people who just mug up facts (Stephens or ramjas or even many IITians who failed prelims thrice in CSAT era )
    So please look deeply into it and realise why all those people failed in CSAT era! Rest it is a toll on the country where ppl who used to mug up facts made it to the list till 2010 but fumbled in CSAT era . In my view it was a welcome change to have certain aptitude and conceptual paper in Gs and then fair test in mains having 4 papers ! Rest who cares about these things . Just keep preparing and try your luck !!
    Not that I know of people from Stephen's who failed between 2010-2013 because of the concept centric paper (sounds bizzare though) but the fact that the entry is through a teeny tiny hole of 100 questions makes sense.
  • It’s not about CSAT paper only. What people miss out is that post CSAT qualifying era , there is only one paper; Gs or not it does not matter , but having only 100 questions that too quite skewed one , see there were 70 questions from current affairs in 2016 and fairly traditional paper in 2017 ! Now here is the catch . There should be 2 papers at least . Whether it is CSAT or not is not the criteria . But making prelims a gamble is taking heavy toll on sincere students . More so when post 2014 , most questions have become factual and the era of concepts I.e 2011 to 2014 is gone.
    Now those claiming to be from good colleges have probably forgotten that it is not the CSAT that killed people primarily , it was the conceptual GS paper that was a real risk for most of these people who just mug up facts (Stephens or ramjas or even many IITians who failed prelims thrice in CSAT era )
    So please look deeply into it and realise why all those people failed in CSAT era! Rest it is a toll on the country where ppl who used to mug up facts made it to the list till 2010 but fumbled in CSAT era . In my view it was a welcome change to have certain aptitude and conceptual paper in Gs and then fair test in mains having 4 papers ! Rest who cares about these things . Just keep preparing and try your luck !!
    Not that I know of people from Stephen's who failed between 2010-2013 because of the concept centric paper (sounds bizzare though) but the fact that the entry is through a teeny tiny hole of 100 questions makes sense.
    Yup !
  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
    you mean to say mugging up the factS is had work ??
    Lolz

  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
    you mean to say mugging up the factS is had work ??
    Lolz

    Well, it is hard work. But it's not what should be the sole criteria for pre. Anyways, pm gave that statement (which was awful imo).
  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
    you mean to say mugging up the factS is had work ??
    Lolz

    Yes !! for me mugging is hardest work... Reading is smooth for me.
  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
    you mean to say mugging up the factS is had work ??
    Lolz

    Well, it is hard work. But it's not what should be the sole criteria for pre. Anyways, pm gave that statement (which was awful imo).
    PM is reeling high on 2014 mandate . Forgive him!

  • I am become dumber imo as time is progressing in this prep..However, it does not matter what is the syllabus n pattern..people with good aptitude skills can do anything
    Bingo!! aptitude is nothing but IQ... of course, people with good IQ perform better in other exams also, if not upsc. At last aptitude wins over muggers :trollface:
    Hard work beats Harvard. Krappa.
    you mean to say mugging up the factS is had work ??
    Lolz

    Yes !! for me mugging is hardest work... Reading is smooth for me.
    Actually fact mugging should never be the aim of any competitive exam!

Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google